Expedited Removal: History, Debate, and Modern Implications
First introduced in 1996, expedited removal has had a long history in the United States.
First introduced in 1996, expedited removal has had a long history in the United States.
Rather than treating neighboring nations—Mexico and even Canada—as sovereign partners, Trump has taken a paternalistic, almost monarchical approach.
Hundreds of individuals were deported after President Trump invoked a wartime authority to expedite the deportation of migrants believed to be connected to a Venezuelan gang.
Trump also touted his idea for a “gold card” visa, a novel way for foreigners to obtain U.S. citizenship.
The White House apparently is flooding social media platforms with disinformation.
Actor John Leguizamo is pushing for a national freeze on all shopping on February 28, calling it an economic blackout.
When people are given more information about the options available, support for mass deportation as the preferred solution drops well below half, overall and among Republicans.
Politicians, Republicans, and Democrats alike are very savvy about how to manipulate media to their advantage.
Hispanic and Latino House Dem’s are at 17 percent, compared to 19 percent in the U.S.
What happens when other nations (especially so-called third-world nations) advance economically and educationally? Does it cause us damage?
If you think it’s harmless political theater—a
wrestling smackdown for the masses—you might want to reconsider. The threat of a
U.S. invasion of Mexico is nothing new.
Democrats have a record number of women in the House and Senate, but just two new women lawmakers are Republican, leading to an overall decline in representation.